Three short lessons on front stage and backstage selves, mimetic desire, and the claim that hierarchy follows possessions.
On this page
Who we are in public, what we want and where we stand may all be shaped by other people. These shorts look at the self as a performance, desire as imitation, and rank as something that may follow possessions.
You talk, sit and even hold your face differently when you are alone. The short says this is not being two-faced. It points to the sociologist Erving Goffman, who in 1959 described life as running on two stages.
Stage
Description
Front stage
Every version of you performing for an audience, at work, in the group chat, on a date or on camera
Backstage
The space where the door closes and the performance drops
As the video presents it, Goffman went further and said performing is the self: there is no hidden real you waiting under the front stage, and the self is built in the switch between the two. The short adds that phones blur the line, since you post the front stage and live the backstage, yet every private message or close-friends story is another backstage with an audience. It asks when you were last fully backstage.
Note
This is the video’s reading of Goffman. Whether the self is only performance is a contested philosophical question.
The philosopher René Girard studied desire and, according to the short, concluded that humans do not generate desire on their own but borrow it. Someone else wants something, and suddenly you want it too. He called this mimetic desire, where mimetic means imitated.
Ask whether you wanted a job, a partner or a lifestyle before you saw someone else have it.
Advertising, the short says, does not sell the product but someone else enjoying it.
Some of what feels like your own ambition or taste may come from whoever you stood closest to when you decided you wanted it.
The video closes with a question: is the thing you are chasing something you want, or something you watched someone else want first?
Note
This is a short summary of Girard’s idea. It does not claim that all desire is borrowed in every case.
Many assume hierarchy is simply human nature. The short points to the Penan, a nomadic people of Borneo shown in the film Tawai by Bruce Parry. Historically everything they owned fit on their back, and the video claims that because they never accumulated possessions, they never developed leaders or a class system.
Common assumption
The short’s argument
Ranking is the starting point of society
Ranking is a result of some people having more money, land or goods
Some people are naturally on top
Without possessions, hierarchy has nothing to attach to
The suggestion is that hierarchy may not be built into human nature but may have begun when humans started keeping score.
Important
This is the video’s account of one society and a speculative argument. It is not established that possessions alone cause hierarchy, and the claim about the Penan is not checked here.
Conclusion
The three shorts question what feels given. The performed self suggests we are shaped by audiences, mimetic desire suggests our wants are shaped by others, and the Penan example suggests rank may be shaped by what people accumulate. Each is presented as a way of thinking, not a proven rule, and each ends by asking what is truly your own.
FAQ
The front stage is every version of you performing for an audience, at work, online or on a date. Backstage is where the door closes and the performance drops.
The self is hidden under the front stage
Performing is the self, built in the switch between stages
Only the backstage self is real
The self does not exist
(2) The short says there is no real you hiding under the performance, and the self is built in the gap between the two stages.
The short says acting differently when alone proves a person is two-faced.
False. It says this is not fake and not a flaw, but the two-stage pattern a sociologist mapped.
Mimetic desire is wanting something because someone else wants it. René Girard argued, as the short presents it, that humans borrow desire instead of generating it on their own.
The product itself
Discounts
Someone else enjoying the product
Information about ingredients
(3) Once you see the product work for someone else, the wanting starts.
The short says the thing you are chasing may come from whoever you were standing closest to.
True. It suggests some ambition or taste may come from the people nearest you rather than from you.
Whether the thing you are chasing is something you actually want, or something you watched someone else want first.
They have a strict class system
They never accumulated possessions and so never developed a hierarchy
They are ruled by one chief
They live in large cities
(2) The short presents them as nomads whose belongings fit on their back, with no leaders or class system. This is the video’s account and not a verified fact.
Because a hierarchy exists when someone has more money, land or goods than someone else. Without accumulation, the ranking has nothing to attach to.
Idea
Thinker or example
A. Front stage and backstage
1. René Girard
B. Mimetic desire
2. The Penan
C. Hierarchy as result of accumulation
3. Erving Goffman
A - 3, B - 1, C - 2.
Vocabulary
Urdu Meaning:سامنے کا اسٹیج، عوامی کردار
Example (EN):The front stage is every version of you performing for an audience.
مثال (اردو):سامنے کا اسٹیج آپ کا وہ روپ ہے جو سامعین کے لیے پیش کیا جاتا ہے۔
اضافی مثال:دفتر اور گروپ چیٹ میں ہم سامنے کے اسٹیج پر ہوتے ہیں۔
Urdu Meaning:پردے کے پیچھے، نجی جگہ
Example (EN):Backstage the door closes and the performance drops.
مثال (اردو):پردے کے پیچھے دروازہ بند ہوتا ہے اور اداکاری ختم ہو جاتی ہے۔
اضافی مثال:تنہائی میں انسان پردے کے پیچھے ہوتا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:ماہرِ سماجیات
Example (EN):Erving Goffman was a sociologist who described life as two stages.
مثال (اردو):ارونگ گوفمین ماہرِ سماجیات تھے جنہوں نے زندگی کو دو اسٹیجوں سے بیان کیا۔
اضافی مثال:ماہرِ سماجیات معاشرے کے رویوں کا مطالعہ کرتا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:پیشکش، اداکاری
Example (EN):In this view the performance is part of the self, not a mask over it.
مثال (اردو):اس نظریے میں اداکاری خود کا حصہ ہے، اس پر نقاب نہیں۔
اضافی مثال:سماجی ماحول کے مطابق ہماری پیشکش بدلتی ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:سامعین، دیکھنے والے
Example (EN):Every close friend's story may turn out to have an audience too.
مثال (اردو):ہر قریبی دوست کی کہانی کے بھی سامعین نکل آتے ہیں۔
اضافی مثال:سامعین ہوں تو رویہ بدل جاتا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:نقل پر مبنی، تقلیدی
Example (EN):Girard called borrowed wanting mimetic desire.
مثال (اردو):جیراغ نے مستعار خواہش کو تقلیدی خواہش کہا۔
اضافی مثال:تقلیدی کا مطلب نقل کیا ہوا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:خواہش، آرزو
Example (EN):Humans may borrow desire from the people around them.
مثال (اردو):انسان اپنی خواہش اردگرد کے لوگوں سے مستعار لے سکتے ہیں۔
اضافی مثال:کسی اور کی خواہش ہماری خواہش بن سکتی ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:عزم، بلند مقصد
Example (EN):What feels like your own ambition may come from someone close to you.
مثال (اردو):جو آپ کو اپنا عزم لگتا ہے وہ کسی قریبی شخص سے آیا ہو سکتا ہے۔
اضافی مثال:عزم پر غور کرنا خود شناسی میں مدد دیتا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:نقل کرنا
Example (EN):We often imitate what the people around us want.
مثال (اردو):ہم اکثر وہی چاہتے ہیں جو ہمارے اردگرد کے لوگ چاہتے ہیں۔
اضافی مثال:بچے بڑوں کی نقل کر کے سیکھتے ہیں۔
Urdu Meaning:اشتہار بازی
Example (EN):Advertising sells you someone else enjoying the product.
مثال (اردو):اشتہار بازی آپ کو کسی اور کا مصنوعات سے لطف اٹھانا بیچتی ہے۔
اضافی مثال:اشتہار خواہش کو جگانے کی کوشش کرتے ہیں۔
Urdu Meaning:درجہ بندی، مراتب کا نظام
Example (EN):Every hierarchy exists because someone has more than someone else.
مثال (اردو):ہر درجہ بندی اس لیے ہے کہ کسی کے پاس دوسرے سے زیادہ ہوتا ہے۔
اضافی مثال:دفتر اور ملک دونوں میں درجہ بندی پائی جاتی ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:خانہ بدوش
Example (EN):The Penan are described as a nomadic people.
مثال (اردو):پینان کو خانہ بدوش لوگ بتایا گیا ہے۔
اضافی مثال:خانہ بدوش لوگ کم سامان لے کر چلتے ہیں۔
Urdu Meaning:جمع کرنا، ذخیرہ کرنا
Example (EN):Because they never accumulated possessions, they had no class system.
مثال (اردو):چونکہ انہوں نے سامان جمع نہیں کیا، ان کے ہاں طبقاتی نظام نہیں تھا۔
اضافی مثال:دولت جمع کرنا درجہ بندی کو جنم دے سکتا ہے۔
Urdu Meaning:ملکیت، مال و اسباب
Example (EN):Take away the possessions and the hierarchy has nowhere to stand.
مثال (اردو):ملکیت ختم کر دیں تو درجہ بندی کے لیے کوئی بنیاد نہیں رہتی۔
اضافی مثال:زمین اور پیسہ بھی ملکیت ہیں۔
Urdu Meaning:مفروضہ، فرض کی ہوئی بات
Example (EN):Many people never question the assumption that hierarchy is natural.
مثال (اردو):بہت سے لوگ اس مفروضے پر سوال نہیں اٹھاتے کہ درجہ بندی فطری ہے۔
Disclosure: Some links on this page may contain affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.